http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FnEce9O3zo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTPCHPPxOvI
FASHION: HARAJUKU GIRLS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hghjAEzIS-c
The video posted is
based on the four Japanese girls Gwen Stefani adopted as her backup dancer
called Harajuku girls. The idea of Harajuku
girls derive from a street in Japan where individuals would dress in unique, mixed
matched clothing with funky hair and makeup every Sunday called Harajuku. The Harajuku girls frequently dress in unique
Japanese based style in Stefani’s music videos; for example, Hollerback girl,
Rich Girls and more. Although the
Harajuku style has been around for a long time in Japan, it was only introduced
by Stefani a few years ago. Harajuku
girls display racial, ethnic and cultural differences since it was not common
to see girls in colourful mixed matched clothing before Stefani’s
introduction. Therefore, when you see a
girl dressed in Harajuku girls’ sense of style, it would be assumed that she is
into the Japanese culture. Also, due to the arrival of this style, girls wear
more mixed matched clothing and funky hair and makeup to show a sense of style
and uniqueness since Harajuku is one of world’s most fashion iconic
streets. Thus, dressing like Harajuku
girls can emit the impression that you are unique. Additionally, this video relates to our discussion
we had in class when we were debating the issue of commodifying race or
culture. Commodifying culture should not
be an issue since it is not taking away individual’s culture but embracing
it. If Stefani had not introduced the
Harajuku girls to mainstream Western society, people may not know who they are
and what it is.
This form of consumption is impractical since attempting to unique is essentially what mainstream society is about. By consuming the Harajuku girls’ style, when Stefani introduced them to the Western society, you are not showing uniqueness; rather you are consuming what others are consuming. In Western society, it is hard to be completely unique since the majority of our fashion and clothing are mass produced. Therefore, if you bought the “unique shirt”, there is a big chance that someone else did too. Also, when you do stumble upon something unique, it is very likely that it will later become the mainstream style. Thus, attempting to separate oneself from the mainstream by consumption is unfeasible.
Introducing the wedding industry was a really interesting way to discuss consumerism. It's sad that weddings (binding two people through love), has been exploited by materialistic "false needs". This issue is generally gender oriented; women are mainly targeted. The Wedding Industry essentially thrives because women are so driven to have THE perfect wedding. (That ultimately means "topping" their friends' weddings; such as having a bigger hall, a better dress, and a bigger 7 tiered cake). The wedding industry takes advantage of these [clearly] vulnerable women (knowing that they will 'have' to buy anything and everything in order to make their wedding day perfect).
ReplyDelete-Diana C